Boxcryptor

VS

Signal

Cybersecurity Comparison

Boxcryptor vs Signal: Side-by-Side Comparison

Boxcryptor
Signal
Rating
★★★★★★★★★★
4.1/5
★★★★★★★★★★
4.7/5
Free Tier
Yes
Yes
Trial Days
14-day trial
None
Pricing
Personal Free plan; Personal $4.20/mo; Business $8/user/mo
Completely free, funded by donations
Company
Secomba GmbH (acquired by Dropbox)
Signal Foundation
Founded
2011
2014
Best For
Teams encrypting sensitive files on corporate cloud storage from provider access
Privacy advocates wanting the most trusted end-to-end encrypted messaging available

Pros & Cons

200 Jobs AI Will Replace
FREE REPORT

200 Jobs AI Will Replace

Is yours on the list? 52% of workers are already worried. Find out where your career stands before it's too late.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.

Boxcryptor

Encrypts files before they reach Dropbox, Google Drive, or OneDrive servers
Zero-knowledge design means Boxcryptor cannot decrypt your files at all
Works transparently as a virtual drive requiring no workflow change
Company access feature enables encrypted file sharing within teams
End-to-end encrypted Whisply link sharing with non-Boxcryptor users
Discontinued in 2023 after acquisition; migrated to Dropbox integration only
Pricing was higher than standalone cloud storage subscriptions

Signal

Signal Protocol encryption is industry standard adopted by WhatsApp and others
No metadata collection; Signal cannot see who you message or when
Disappearing messages with customizable timer per conversation thread
Note to Self encrypted personal notes sync across all your devices
Completely free with no ads, no data collection, and open-source code
Requires phone number for registration exposing identity to contacts
Desktop app requires phone to be active for some notification features

Use Case Analysis

Which is better for Encryption?

Both Boxcryptor and Signal support Encryption workflows. Signal has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and The gold standard encryption protocol used as the basis for all major secure messengers. If Encryption is your primary use case, Signal is the safer pick.

Which is better for Privacy?

Both Boxcryptor and Signal support Privacy workflows. Signal has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and The gold standard encryption protocol used as the basis for all major secure messengers. If Privacy is your primary use case, Signal is the safer pick.

Which is better for Password Management?

Both Boxcryptor and Signal support Password Management workflows. Signal has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and The gold standard encryption protocol used as the basis for all major secure messengers. If Password Management is your primary use case, Signal is the safer pick.

Which is better for Endpoint Security?

Both Boxcryptor and Signal support Endpoint Security workflows. Signal has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and The gold standard encryption protocol used as the basis for all major secure messengers. If Endpoint Security is your primary use case, Signal is the safer pick.

Which is better for Two Factor Authentication?

Both Boxcryptor and Signal support Two Factor Authentication workflows. Signal has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and The gold standard encryption protocol used as the basis for all major secure messengers. If Two Factor Authentication is your primary use case, Signal is the safer pick.

Verdict

Signal edges out Boxcryptor with a 4.7 vs 4.1 rating. Signal's main advantage: The gold standard encryption protocol used as the basis for all major secure messengers. That said, Boxcryptor may still be the better choice if Teams encrypting sensitive files on corporate cloud storage from provider access.

Try Them Yourself

The best way to choose is to trial both. See full details on each:

Try Boxcryptor Download Free

Related Comparisons

Boxcryptor vs Proton Mail Boxcryptor vs YubiKey Boxcryptor vs VeraCrypt Boxcryptor vs Duo Security
200 Jobs AI Will Replace - Is yours on the list? 52% of workers are already worried. Find out where your career stands before it's too late.