Boxcryptor

VS

Proton Mail

Cybersecurity Comparison

Boxcryptor vs Proton Mail: Side-by-Side Comparison

Boxcryptor
Proton Mail
Rating
★★★★★★★★★★
4.1/5
★★★★★★★★★★
4.8/5
Free Tier
Yes
Yes
Trial Days
14-day trial
30-day trial
Pricing
Personal Free plan; Personal $4.20/mo; Business $8/user/mo
Free; Plus from $3.99/month
Company
Secomba GmbH (acquired by Dropbox)
Proton AG
Founded
2011
2013
Best For
Teams encrypting sensitive files on corporate cloud storage from provider access
Journalists and activists needing legally protected private email communications

Pros & Cons

200 Jobs AI Will Replace
FREE REPORT

200 Jobs AI Will Replace

Is yours on the list? 52% of workers are already worried. Find out where your career stands before it's too late.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.

Boxcryptor

Encrypts files before they reach Dropbox, Google Drive, or OneDrive servers
Zero-knowledge design means Boxcryptor cannot decrypt your files at all
Works transparently as a virtual drive requiring no workflow change
Company access feature enables encrypted file sharing within teams
End-to-end encrypted Whisply link sharing with non-Boxcryptor users
Discontinued in 2023 after acquisition; migrated to Dropbox integration only
Pricing was higher than standalone cloud storage subscriptions

Proton Mail

End-to-end encryption means Proton cannot read your emails even if subpoenaed
Swiss legal jurisdiction provides some of strongest privacy protections globally
Zero-access encryption protects email subject lines and body at rest
ProtonMail Bridge lets you use Outlook and Apple Mail with encrypted backend
Onion site accessible via Tor for maximum anonymity even from Proton
Free tier limited to 500 MB storage and one email address only
Encrypted email only works between Proton users; external emails less protected

Use Case Analysis

Which is better for Encryption?

Both Boxcryptor and Proton Mail support Encryption workflows. Proton Mail has a slight edge with a 4.8 rating and Swiss-jurisdiction zero-knowledge encryption protects emails from provider access entirely. If Encryption is your primary use case, Proton Mail is the safer pick.

Which is better for Privacy?

Both Boxcryptor and Proton Mail support Privacy workflows. Proton Mail has a slight edge with a 4.8 rating and Swiss-jurisdiction zero-knowledge encryption protects emails from provider access entirely. If Privacy is your primary use case, Proton Mail is the safer pick.

Which is better for Password Management?

Both Boxcryptor and Proton Mail support Password Management workflows. Proton Mail has a slight edge with a 4.8 rating and Swiss-jurisdiction zero-knowledge encryption protects emails from provider access entirely. If Password Management is your primary use case, Proton Mail is the safer pick.

Which is better for Endpoint Security?

Both Boxcryptor and Proton Mail support Endpoint Security workflows. Proton Mail has a slight edge with a 4.8 rating and Swiss-jurisdiction zero-knowledge encryption protects emails from provider access entirely. If Endpoint Security is your primary use case, Proton Mail is the safer pick.

Which is better for Two Factor Authentication?

Both Boxcryptor and Proton Mail support Two Factor Authentication workflows. Proton Mail has a slight edge with a 4.8 rating and Swiss-jurisdiction zero-knowledge encryption protects emails from provider access entirely. If Two Factor Authentication is your primary use case, Proton Mail is the safer pick.

Verdict

Proton Mail edges out Boxcryptor with a 4.8 vs 4.1 rating. Proton Mail's main advantage: Swiss-jurisdiction zero-knowledge encryption protects emails from provider access entirely. That said, Boxcryptor may still be the better choice if Teams encrypting sensitive files on corporate cloud storage from provider access.

Try Them Yourself

The best way to choose is to trial both. See full details on each:

Try Boxcryptor Get Started
200 Jobs AI Will Replace - Is yours on the list? 52% of workers are already worried. Find out where your career stands before it's too late.