Pi-hole

VS

Rapid7 InsightVM

Cybersecurity Comparison

Pi-hole vs Rapid7 InsightVM: Side-by-Side Comparison

Pi-hole
Rapid7 InsightVM
Rating
★★★★★★★★★★
4.7/5
★★★★★★★★★★
4.3/5
Free Tier
Yes
No
Trial Days
None
30-day trial
Pricing
Free (open source)
InsightVM from $1.84/asset/mo; 30-day free trial available
Company
Pi-hole LLC
Rapid7
Founded
2014
2000
Best For
Home lab enthusiasts wanting network-level protection for every connected device
Security teams wanting dynamic risk-prioritized vulnerability management plus MDR option

Pros & Cons

200 Jobs AI Will Replace
FREE REPORT

200 Jobs AI Will Replace

Is yours on the list? 52% of workers are already worried. Find out where your career stands before it's too late.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pi-hole

Network-wide DNS blocking stops ads and trackers on all connected devices
Completely free and open-source with active community development
Admin dashboard shows detailed query logs and block statistics in real time
Works on smart TVs, gaming consoles, and IoT devices automatically
Runs on Raspberry Pi hardware costing under 50 dollars one-time
Requires Raspberry Pi or server setup which intimidates non-technical users
Breaks some websites and apps that depend on ad network domain resolution

Rapid7 InsightVM

InsightVM provides live vulnerability risk scoring that updates as network changes
InsightIDR cloud SIEM correlates endpoint, user, and network data automatically
Managed Detection and Response service available for teams without SOC staff
AttackerKB community platform provides adversary perspective on vulnerability impact
tCell application security protects web apps with runtime agent protection
Pricing is premium and requires annual commitment for best contract rates
InsightVM setup requires Nexpose Engine deployment which adds implementation time

Use Case Analysis

Which is better for Privacy?

Both Pi-hole and Rapid7 InsightVM support Privacy workflows. Pi-hole has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. If Privacy is your primary use case, Pi-hole is the safer pick.

Which is better for Encryption?

Both Pi-hole and Rapid7 InsightVM support Encryption workflows. Pi-hole has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. If Encryption is your primary use case, Pi-hole is the safer pick.

Which is better for Endpoint Security?

Both Pi-hole and Rapid7 InsightVM support Endpoint Security workflows. Pi-hole has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. If Endpoint Security is your primary use case, Pi-hole is the safer pick.

Which is better for Antivirus?

Both Pi-hole and Rapid7 InsightVM support Antivirus workflows. Pi-hole has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. If Antivirus is your primary use case, Pi-hole is the safer pick.

Which is better for Two Factor Authentication?

Both Pi-hole and Rapid7 InsightVM support Two Factor Authentication workflows. Pi-hole has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. If Two Factor Authentication is your primary use case, Pi-hole is the safer pick.

Verdict

Pi-hole edges out Rapid7 InsightVM with a 4.7 vs 4.3 rating. Pi-hole's main advantage: Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. That said, Rapid7 InsightVM may still be the better choice if Security teams wanting dynamic risk-prioritized vulnerability management plus MDR option.

Try Them Yourself

The best way to choose is to trial both. See full details on each:

Explore Free Get Started

Related Comparisons

Cloudflare vs Pi-hole Palo Alto Networks vs Pi-hole Fortinet vs Pi-hole ESET vs Pi-hole
200 Jobs AI Will Replace - Is yours on the list? 52% of workers are already worried. Find out where your career stands before it's too late.