Pi-hole

VS

Quad9

Cybersecurity Comparison

Pi-hole vs Quad9: Side-by-Side Comparison

Pi-hole
Quad9
Rating
★★★★★★★★★★
4.7/5
★★★★★★★★★★
4.5/5
Free Tier
Yes
Yes
Trial Days
None
None
Pricing
Free (open source)
Free (non-profit)
Company
Pi-hole LLC
Quad9 Foundation
Founded
2014
2016
Best For
Home lab enthusiasts wanting network-level protection for every connected device
Privacy-first users wanting malware-blocking DNS without any data collection

Pros & Cons

200 Jobs AI Will Replace
FREE REPORT

200 Jobs AI Will Replace

Is yours on the list? 52% of workers are already worried. Find out where your career stands before it's too late.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pi-hole

Network-wide DNS blocking stops ads and trackers on all connected devices
Completely free and open-source with active community development
Admin dashboard shows detailed query logs and block statistics in real time
Works on smart TVs, gaming consoles, and IoT devices automatically
Runs on Raspberry Pi hardware costing under 50 dollars one-time
Requires Raspberry Pi or server setup which intimidates non-technical users
Breaks some websites and apps that depend on ad network domain resolution

Quad9

Malicious domain blocking using 25 plus threat intelligence providers simultaneously
Strict no-logging policy with no personally identifiable data retained
Non-profit organization with no commercial data monetization incentive
DNSSEC validation ensures responses have not been tampered with in transit
Free with no account registration or configuration beyond changing DNS IP
No content filtering options for parental controls or category blocking
Slightly higher latency than Cloudflare 1.1.1.1 in some geographic regions

Use Case Analysis

Which is better for Privacy?

Both Pi-hole and Quad9 support Privacy workflows. Pi-hole has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. If Privacy is your primary use case, Pi-hole is the safer pick.

Which is better for Encryption?

Both Pi-hole and Quad9 support Encryption workflows. Pi-hole has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. If Encryption is your primary use case, Pi-hole is the safer pick.

Which is better for Endpoint Security?

Both Pi-hole and Quad9 support Endpoint Security workflows. Pi-hole has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. If Endpoint Security is your primary use case, Pi-hole is the safer pick.

Which is better for Antivirus?

Both Pi-hole and Quad9 support Antivirus workflows. Pi-hole has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. If Antivirus is your primary use case, Pi-hole is the safer pick.

Which is better for Two Factor Authentication?

Both Pi-hole and Quad9 support Two Factor Authentication workflows. Pi-hole has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. If Two Factor Authentication is your primary use case, Pi-hole is the safer pick.

Verdict

Pi-hole edges out Quad9 with a 4.7 vs 4.5 rating. Pi-hole's main advantage: Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. That said, Quad9 may still be the better choice if Privacy-first users wanting malware-blocking DNS without any data collection.

Try Them Yourself

The best way to choose is to trial both. See full details on each:

Explore Free Visit Quad9

Related Comparisons

Cloudflare vs Pi-hole Palo Alto Networks vs Pi-hole Fortinet vs Pi-hole ESET vs Pi-hole
200 Jobs AI Will Replace - Is yours on the list? 52% of workers are already worried. Find out where your career stands before it's too late.