Krisp

VS

Notta

AI Tools Comparison

Krisp vs Notta: Side-by-Side Comparison

Krisp
Notta
Rating
★★★★★★★★★★
4.6/5
★★★★★★★★★★
4.4/5
Free Tier
Yes
Yes
Trial Days
None
None
Pricing
Free tier (60 min/day noise cancellation). Pro $8/month. Business $15/seat/month.
Free tier (120 minutes/month). Pro $14.99/month. Business $59.99/month (5 seats).
Company
Krisp
Notta
Founded
2017
2020
Best For
Remote workers on video calls from noisy home offices or public spaces needing professional audio
International teams transcribing multilingual meetings and importing existing audio archives

Pros & Cons

200 Jobs AI Will Replace
FREE REPORT

200 Jobs AI Will Replace

Is yours on the list? 52% of workers are already worried. Find out where your career stands before it's too late.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.

Krisp

Removes background noise and echo from microphone and speaker audio simultaneously
Works with every conferencing app without plugins - functions as a virtual audio device
AI meeting assistant records, transcribes, and summarizes calls automatically
On-device processing keeps audio data private and never sends it to the cloud
Cancels background voices separately from the primary speaker in noisy environments
Free tier limited to 60 minutes of noise cancellation per week
Occasionally slightly degrades voice quality when noise cancellation is aggressive

Notta

Real-time AI transcription with 98.86% accuracy across 104 languages
AI summary generates meeting minutes and action items within seconds of call ending
Integrates with Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, and Webex for automatic recording
Screen recorder captures web meetings even without bot joining privileges
Import audio and video files for offline transcription and summarization
Transcript accuracy noticeably lower for speakers with heavy non-English accents
Free tier limits transcription to 120 minutes total - depletes quickly

Use Case Analysis

Which is better for Meeting Assistant?

Both Krisp and Notta support Meeting Assistant workflows. Krisp has a slight edge with a 4.6 rating and On-device noise cancellation processing audio locally for privacy with no conference app plugin needed. If Meeting Assistant is your primary use case, Krisp is the safer pick.

Which is better for Transcription?

Both Krisp and Notta support Transcription workflows. Krisp has a slight edge with a 4.6 rating and On-device noise cancellation processing audio locally for privacy with no conference app plugin needed. If Transcription is your primary use case, Krisp is the safer pick.

Verdict

Krisp edges out Notta with a 4.6 vs 4.4 rating. Krisp's main advantage: On-device noise cancellation processing audio locally for privacy with no conference app plugin needed. That said, Notta may still be the better choice if International teams transcribing multilingual meetings and importing existing audio archives.

Try Them Yourself

The best way to choose is to trial both. See full details on each:

Try Krisp Free Try Notta Free

Related Comparisons

Krisp vs Otter.ai Fireflies.ai vs Krisp Krisp vs Tactiq Notta vs Otter.ai
200 Jobs AI Will Replace - Is yours on the list? 52% of workers are already worried. Find out where your career stands before it's too late.