GlassWire

VS

Pi-hole

Cybersecurity Comparison

GlassWire vs Pi-hole: Side-by-Side Comparison

GlassWire
Pi-hole
Rating
★★★★★★★★★★
4.3/5
★★★★★★★★★★
4.7/5
Free Tier
Yes
Yes
Trial Days
None
None
Pricing
Basic free plan; Basic paid $2.99/mo; Pro $7.99/mo; Elite $15.99/mo
Free (open source)
Company
SecureMix LLC
Pi-hole LLC
Founded
2014
2014
Best For
Windows users wanting visual network monitoring to detect suspicious app communications
Home lab enthusiasts wanting network-level protection for every connected device

Pros & Cons

200 Jobs AI Will Replace
FREE REPORT

200 Jobs AI Will Replace

Is yours on the list? 52% of workers are already worried. Find out where your career stands before it's too late.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.

GlassWire

Visual network activity graph shows every app's bandwidth usage in real time
Firewall integration blocks apps from accessing internet with one click
Remote monitoring allows managing multiple computers from central dashboard
Alerts on new device connections to your Wi-Fi network automatically
Free version provides basic network monitoring without requiring payment
Windows-only with no macOS or Linux version limiting cross-platform households
Firewall blocking is less granular than dedicated firewall solutions like pfSense

Pi-hole

Network-wide DNS blocking stops ads and trackers on all connected devices
Completely free and open-source with active community development
Admin dashboard shows detailed query logs and block statistics in real time
Works on smart TVs, gaming consoles, and IoT devices automatically
Runs on Raspberry Pi hardware costing under 50 dollars one-time
Requires Raspberry Pi or server setup which intimidates non-technical users
Breaks some websites and apps that depend on ad network domain resolution

Use Case Analysis

Which is better for Privacy?

Both GlassWire and Pi-hole support Privacy workflows. Pi-hole has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. If Privacy is your primary use case, Pi-hole is the safer pick.

Which is better for Endpoint Security?

Both GlassWire and Pi-hole support Endpoint Security workflows. Pi-hole has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. If Endpoint Security is your primary use case, Pi-hole is the safer pick.

Which is better for Antivirus?

Both GlassWire and Pi-hole support Antivirus workflows. Pi-hole has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. If Antivirus is your primary use case, Pi-hole is the safer pick.

Which is better for Encryption?

Both GlassWire and Pi-hole support Encryption workflows. Pi-hole has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. If Encryption is your primary use case, Pi-hole is the safer pick.

Which is better for Two Factor Authentication?

Both GlassWire and Pi-hole support Two Factor Authentication workflows. Pi-hole has a slight edge with a 4.7 rating and Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. If Two Factor Authentication is your primary use case, Pi-hole is the safer pick.

Verdict

Pi-hole edges out GlassWire with a 4.7 vs 4.3 rating. Pi-hole's main advantage: Free network-wide DNS ad blocking covering every device without per-device setup. That said, GlassWire may still be the better choice if Windows users wanting visual network monitoring to detect suspicious app communications.

Try Them Yourself

The best way to choose is to trial both. See full details on each:

Download Free Explore Free
200 Jobs AI Will Replace - Is yours on the list? 52% of workers are already worried. Find out where your career stands before it's too late.