Duo Security

VS

Session

Cybersecurity Comparison

Duo Security vs Session: Side-by-Side Comparison

Duo Security
Session
Rating
★★★★★★★★★★
4.6/5
★★★★★★★★★★
4/5
Free Tier
Yes
Yes
Trial Days
30-day trial
None
Pricing
Free for up to 10 users; Essentials from $3/user/mo; Advantage from $6/user/mo
Completely free and open source
Company
Cisco
Oxen Privacy Tech Foundation
Founded
2010
2020
Best For
Enterprises needing MFA that verifies device security posture not just user identity
High-risk activists needing fully decentralized untraceable encrypted messaging

Pros & Cons

200 Jobs AI Will Replace
FREE REPORT

200 Jobs AI Will Replace

Is yours on the list? 52% of workers are already worried. Find out where your career stands before it's too late.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.

Duo Security

Cisco-backed enterprise MFA with trusted access verification for every request
Passwordless authentication via Duo Push notification eliminates password risk
Device trust verification checks health of devices before granting access
Single Sign-On integration works with all major identity providers seamlessly
Free tier supports up to 10 users for small team evaluation
Enterprise pricing can be expensive for small to medium businesses
Phone call and SMS fallback options are less secure than app-based MFA

Session

Decentralized network with no central server that can be seized or subpoenaed
Account requires no phone number, email, or any personal identifier
Onion routing hides IP address from the Session network itself
Open-source code audited by community security researchers regularly
Completely free with no ads and no data collection of any kind
Smaller network means message delivery can be slower than centralized apps
Fewer features than Signal including no voice or video calling support

Use Case Analysis

Which is better for Two Factor Authentication?

Both Duo Security and Session support Two Factor Authentication workflows. Duo Security has a slight edge with a 4.6 rating and Cisco-backed device health verification ensures only secure devices access corporate apps. If Two Factor Authentication is your primary use case, Duo Security is the safer pick.

Which is better for Encryption?

Both Duo Security and Session support Encryption workflows. Duo Security has a slight edge with a 4.6 rating and Cisco-backed device health verification ensures only secure devices access corporate apps. If Encryption is your primary use case, Duo Security is the safer pick.

Which is better for Privacy?

Both Duo Security and Session support Privacy workflows. Duo Security has a slight edge with a 4.6 rating and Cisco-backed device health verification ensures only secure devices access corporate apps. If Privacy is your primary use case, Duo Security is the safer pick.

Which is better for Endpoint Security?

Both Duo Security and Session support Endpoint Security workflows. Duo Security has a slight edge with a 4.6 rating and Cisco-backed device health verification ensures only secure devices access corporate apps. If Endpoint Security is your primary use case, Duo Security is the safer pick.

Which is better for Password Management?

Both Duo Security and Session support Password Management workflows. Duo Security has a slight edge with a 4.6 rating and Cisco-backed device health verification ensures only secure devices access corporate apps. If Password Management is your primary use case, Duo Security is the safer pick.

Verdict

Duo Security edges out Session with a 4.6 vs 4 rating. Duo Security's main advantage: Cisco-backed device health verification ensures only secure devices access corporate apps. That said, Session may still be the better choice if High-risk activists needing fully decentralized untraceable encrypted messaging.

Try Them Yourself

The best way to choose is to trial both. See full details on each:

Try Duo Download Free
200 Jobs AI Will Replace - Is yours on the list? 52% of workers are already worried. Find out where your career stands before it's too late.